Rotator Cuff Clinical Presentation.
Last updated Wednesday, January 26, 2005
Clinical manifestations of cuff disease The clinical manifestations of the various clinical forms of cuff
disease include difficulties with shoulder stiffness, weakness,
instability and roughness. (Matsen, Lippitt, 1994, Samilson and Binder,
1975) Stiffness limits passive range of motion and frequently causes pain at the end point of motion as well as difficulty sleeping.Stiffness as limitation Stiffness is most common in partial thickness cuff lesions, but may
also be associated with full thickness cuff defects. (Jackson, 1976)
Stiffness may be demonstrable as limitations of:
- internal rotation with the arm in abduction (degrees from the neutral position) (see figure 1),
- reach up the back (posterior segment reached with the thumb) (see figure 2),
- cross-body adduction (centimeters from the ipsilateral antecubital
fossa to the contralateral acromion or coracoid) (see figure 3),
- flexion (degrees from the neutral position) (see figure 4), or
- external rotation (degrees from the neutral position) (see figure 5).
Weakness or pain on muscle contraction limits the function of the shoulder with cuff disease.More about weakness Tendon fibers weakened by degeneration may fail without clinical
manifestations or may produce only transient symptoms interpreted as
"bursitis" or "tendinitis." A greater injury is required to tear the
cuff of individuals at the younger end of the age distribution.
Traumatic glenohumeral dislocations in individuals over the age of 40
have a strong association with rotator cuff tears. These traumatic cuff
tears commonly involve the subscapularis, producing weakness in
internal rotation. Neviaser et al (Neviaser, Neviaser, 1993) reported
on thirty-seven patients older than 40 years of age in whom the
diagnosis of cuff rupture was initially missed after an anterior
dislocation of the shoulder. The weakness from the cuff rupture was
often erroneously attributed to axillary neuropathy. Eleven of these
patients developed recurrent anterior instability that was due to
rupture of the subscapularis and anterior capsule from the lesser
tuberosity. None of these shoulders had a Bankart lesion. Repair of the
capsule and subscapularis restored stability in all of the patients
with recurrence.
Sonnabend reported a series of primary shoulder dislocations in
patients (Sonnabend, 1994) older than 40 years of age. Of the 13
patients who had complaints of weakness or pain after 3 weeks, eleven
had rotator cuff tears. Toolanen found sonographic evidence of rotator
cuff lesions in 24 of 63 patients over the age of 40 years at the time
of anterior glenohumeral dislocation. (Toolanen, Hildingsson, 1993) Manifesting weakness Even though patients with full thickness cuff defects may still
retain the ability to actively abduct the arm, (Neviaser, 1971)
significant tendon fiber failure is usually manifest by weakness on
manual muscle testing. (Brems, 1987 Jan, Hawkins, Misamore, 1985,
Leroux, Codine, 1994, Leroux, Thomas, 1995) Isometric testing of muscle
strength prevents confusion with symptoms which may arise from shoulder
movement (such as those associated with subacromial abrasion). While
the individual cuff muscles cannot be specifically isolated the
following isometric tests are reasonably selective (see figure 6):
- supraspinatus: isometric elevation of the arm held in 90 of elevation in the plane of the scapula and in mild internal rotation.
- subscapularis: isometric internal rotation of the arm with the
elbow flexed to 90 and the hand held posteriorly just off the waist.
- infraspinatus: isometric external rotation of the arm held at the side in neutral rotation with the elbow flexed to 90.
These simple manual tests are helpful in characterizing the size of
the tendon defects, from single tendon tears involving only the
supraspinatus, to two tendon tears involving the supra and
infraspinatus to three tendon tears involving the subscapularis as
well.
Individuals with partial thickness cuff lesions have substantially
more pain on resisted muscle action than those with full thickness
lesions. This phenomenon is analogous to the observation that partial
tears of the Achilles tendon, partial tears of the patellar tendon, and
partial tears of the origin of the extensor carpi radialis brevis are
more painful on muscle contraction than when the complete structure is
ruptured or surgically released. Fukuda and coworkers (Fukuda, Mikasa,
1987) characterized patients with partial-thickness cuff tears as
having pain on motion, crepitus, and stiffness. They observed that
patients with bursal side tears seemed more symptomatic than those with
deeper tears, due to the resulting problems with roughness of the
articulation between the upper surface cuff and the under surface of
the coracoacromial arch.
Some have suggested that weakness from pain inhibition can be
distinguished from weakness from tendon defect by a subacromial
injection of local anesthetic. (Ben-Yishay, Zuckerman, 1994, Lindblom
and Palmer, 1939) If cuff dysfunction has been present for more than a
month or so, it may be accompanied by supraspinatus and infraspinatus
muscle atrophy. Subtle atrophy can be seen most easily by casting a
shadow from a light over the head of the patient. Defects in the cuff As pointed out by Codman (Codman, 1934b) defects in the cuff can often
be palpated by rotating the proximal humerus under the examiner's
finger placed at the anterior corner of the acromion. The perimeters of
the "divot" left by a defect in the supraspinatus are particularly easy
to palpate. The defect is usually just posterior to the bicipital
groove and medial to the greater tuberosity. The inability to keep the head centered in the glenoid may result from cuff disease.Acute tears Acute tears of the subscapularis may contribute to recurrent anterior
instability. (Neviaser, Neviaser, 1993, Sonnabend, 1994, Toolanen,
Hildingsson, 1993)Chronic loss of compressive effect Chronic loss of the normal compressive effect of the cuff mechanism and
of the stabilizing effect of the superior cuff tendon interposed
between the humeral head and the coracoacromial arch may contribute to
superior glenohumeral instability. (Flatow, Raimondo, 1996, Flatow,
Soslowsky, 1994, Lazarus, Harryman II, 1995, February 16-21, Poppen and
Walker, 1976, Ziegler, Matsen III, 1996) Superior instability is
magnified in the presence of wear of the upper glenoid rim (see figures
7-9) (Neer, Craig, 1983) and when the normal supportive function of the
coracoacromial arch is lost from erosion or surgical removal. (Wiley,
1991) Roughness associated with cuff disease manifests itself as symptomatic crepitus on passive glenohumeral motion.More about rougness Bursal hypertrophy, secondary changes in the undersurface of the
coracoacromial arch, loss of the integrity of the upper aspect of the
cuff tendons, degenerative changes of the tuberosities may all
contribute to subacromial abrasion. Crepitus from subacromial abrasion
is easily detected by placing the examiner's thumb and fingers on the
anterior and posterior aspects of the acromion while the humerus is
moved relative to the scapula (see figures 10 and 11). In that many
shoulders demonstrate asymptomatic subacromial crepitus, it is
important during the examination to ask whether the crepitus noted by
the examiner is directly related to the patient's complaints.
Rotator cuff tear arthropathy is another cause of roughness
associated with cuff disease. This term, coined by Neer and coworkers
(Neer, Craig, 1983), denotes the loss of the glenohumeral articular
surface in association with a massive rotator cuff deficiency (see
figure 12). These authors described 26 shoulders of which over 75% were
in female patients. The average age was 69 years; 20 per cent had
evidence of contralateral cuff arthropathy, and 75 per cent had no
history of trauma. Typically the shoulders were swollen, the muscles
atrophic, and the long head biceps ruptured; passive elevation was
limited to an average of 90 degrees of elevation and 20 degrees of
external rotation (a degree of limitation atypical of uncomplicated
cuff tears). Often the shoulder demonstrated anteroposterior
instability. Collapse of the proximal humeral subchondral bone was a
common observation. Glenoid, greater tuberosity, acromial, and lateral
clavicular erosion were also commonly observed. The authors
hypothesized that the arthropathy resulted from both mechanical factors
(such as anteroposterior instability and superior migration of the
humeral head) (see figures 13-17) and nutritional factors (such as loss
of a closed joint space, lack ofnormal diffusion of nutrients to the
joint surface, and disuse). To this list could be added the disruption
of the tendinous--osseous circulation entering through the subscapular,
anterior humeral circumflex, and suprascapular vessels. This condition
is distinct from osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, avascular
necrosis, and neurogenic arthropathy. (Neer, 1983)
|