Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine  
  Home   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Links   |   News  
Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine  
Advanced Search
Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine
HomeIntroductionSurgical detailsWhen cuff repair cannot be achievedArthrodesisSalvage optionWhen cuff repair is possiblePartial thickness cuff tearsResults of treatmentRehabilitation after cuff surgery

Print Print Complete Article
View article with questions Hide Questions



More Information on Rotator Cuff Surgery.

Last updated Wednesday, January 26, 2005

<< Previous Page Next Page >>

Figure 4 - Position of fusion
Figure 4 - Position of fusion

Arthrodesis

When a massive cuff defect coexists with a detached, denervated, or dysfunctional deltoid, the shoulder is without effective glenohumeral motors.

Salvage option

Under these circumstances, a glenohumeral arthrodesis provides a salvage option. By securing the humeral head to the scapula, the scapular motors can be used to power the humerus through a very limited range of humerothoracic motion. We prefer a fusion technique which preserves all remaining deltoid function, and which uses decortication of the humerus and glenoid, 6.5 mm compression screws across the joint, with or without a neutralization plate from the scapular spine across the joint and down the humeral shaft.

The best candidates for this procedure are those patients with:

  1. permanent and severe weakness due to loss of cuff and deltoid function;
  2. a good understanding of the limitations and potential complications of a shoulder fusion;
  3. intact scapular motors;
  4. good motivation; and
  5. minimal complaints of pain.

To establish the limitations of shoulder fusions, we studied the humerothoracic motion of twelve patients who had glenohumeral arthrodeses at least two years prior to the time of study. Elevation in the plus 90 degrees (anterior sagittal) plane averaged 47 degrees. Elevation in the minus 90 degrees (posterior sagittal) plane averaged 22 degrees. External rotation averaged 9 degrees and internal rotation 46 degrees. These ranges of motion were similar to the scapulothoracic motion measured in normal subjects. Only one of the patients could reach his hair without bending his neck forward, only five could reach their perineum, six could reach the back pocket, seven the opposite axilla, and ten the side pocket.

We studied normal in vivo shoulder kinematics to predict the functions which would be allowed by various positions of glenohumeral arthrodesis, assuming that the scapulothoracic motion would remain unchanged. Using the normal scapulothoracic motions we were able to model the functional effects of fusion positions (reported in relation to the thorax). We found that activities of daily living could be best performed if the joint was fused in 15 degrees of flexion, 15 degrees of abduction, and 45 degrees of internal rotation. This position of fusion with a low angle of elevation and relatively high degree of internal rotation facilitated reaching the face, opposite axilla, and perineum (see figure). However, all positions represented major compromises of normal function.


<< Previous Page Next Page >>


How useful was this page or article?

This article is rated ****0.28 out of 5 stars (402 ratings).

Not useful at all Not very useful Useful Very useful Extremely useful
* ** *** **** *****
Team Physicians to the UW Huskies Varsity Athletes...And You!
Copyrights and disclaimer  | Privacy statement | Editorial policy
Problems or questions? Contact the webmaster.
Copyright © 2008 University of Washington - Seattle, WA. All rights reserved.