Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine  
  Home   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Links   |   News  
Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine  
Advanced Search
Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine
HomeIntroductionTreatment and managementConsiderations in treating childrenConsiderations in treating ACL injuries in childreAgeInjuryLaxityTunnelsGraftComplicationsAuthor's preferred surgical techniqueConclusion

Print Print Complete Article
View article with questions View article with questions



Technical Information about ACL Injuries in Children.

Last updated Thursday, January 13, 2005

<< Previous Page Next Page >>

Considerations in treating children

Considerations in treating ACL injuries in childre

All of the reported studies on ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients are complicated by the wide range of ages of the study subjects. Most studies deal with patients who are post pubertal and near skeletal maturity. This is clearly a different group when compared to the patient near skeletal maturity.

The important considerations for treatment in this age group include:

  1. determining biological age,
  2. appropriate classification of injury type,
  3. accurately quantifying laxity,
  4. the effect of transphyseal drill holes on subsequent growth,
  5. special considerations in graft selection in the skeletally immature, and
  6. complications.

Age

The determination of biologic age is necessary when comparing methods of treatment and when devising a treatment plan. The Tanner Staging of biologic age is an appropriate way to classify skeletally immature patients (30). A simplification of this system would be to combine groups I and II into a prepubescent category and groups III and IV into a pubescent category.

Those in the pubescent group have developed secondary sexual characteristics and are near full growth. Patients in this group can be generally treated as adults and make up the bulk of most published studies. Prepubescent patients ( groups I and II) constitute the group of most concern since they have considerable growth remaining. Most recommendations of this chapter pertain to the treatment of prepubescent patients.

Injury

The type of ACL injury is important in formulating a treatment plan and predicting outcome. Injuries can be classified as:

  1. bony avulsions,
  2. interstitial tears, or
  3. bony avulsions with associated interstitial tears.

It is generally agreed that bony avulsions have a better prognosis than interstitial tears. The determination of injury type may require arthroscopic inspection. Although, the use of magnetic resonance imaging has greatly improved the ability to determine the region and extent of injury. With true isolated bony avulsions, a good result can be expected with anatomic replacement of the avulsed fragment.

Laxity

The level of laxity following ACL injury in children is important in treatment decisions. Children in general have more normal laxity than adults and a comparison with the opposite knee is vital. Absolute laxity is also important since functional disability is closely related to absolute laxity. The pivot shift phenomenon usually occurs with anterior laxity of greater than 10 mm. Laxity less than this amount (negative pivot shift or pivot glide) should generally be treated nonoperatively particularly in the prepubescent population. When anterior laxity becomes greater than 15 mm not only are sporting activities dangerous, but everyday activities may become impaired making surgical intervention more necessary.

Tunnels

A review of available literature reveals incomplete knowledge as to the effect of drill holes upon the physis. Most data on physeal closures have been extrapolated from traumatic injuries (31). It is felt that a carefully placed drill hole is far traumatic to the growth plate than are the injuries that are included in most growth arrest studies. Care should be taken to minimize the trauma to the physis when creating drill holes. Several general principles regarding surgery near the physis can be made:

  • Drill holes should be as small as possible.
  • Centrally placed tunnels, if growth is affected, are less likely to cause an angular deformity.
  • Only soft tissue grafts should traverse the physis. Bone blocks or fixation devices that traverse the physis are more likely to cause growth arrest.
  • Extraarticular procedures that require extensive dissection or fixation devices near the physis may be more damaging than transphyseal tunnels.

Graft

Soft tissue grafts only should be considered when transphyseal drill holes are used for ACL reconstruction. Bone blocks traversing the physis have an increased risk for increasing the likelihood for premature physeal closure at that location. Harvesting of an autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft also runs the risk of damaging the tibial tubercle apophysis. The use of allograft or synthetics in this age group has little indication. The most ideal graft for traversing the physis is one of autogenous hamstring tendons.

Complications

Since the potential exists for growth interference following ACL reconstruction through an open physis, there is understandable increased anxiety patient and their family. If a growth disturbance is recognized, a definitive treatment plan should be set in place to minimize the morbidity of this complication; appropriate consultation with a pediatric orthopaedic is helpful to determine the timing and most appropriate intervention. Rehabilitation may also need to be modified to make it more fun to entice cooperation and participation. Should stiffness (arthrofibrosis) develop in this age group, arthroscopy and release of adhesions is preferred over manipulation alone since less than gentle manipulation may potentially endanger the physis.


<< Previous Page Next Page >>


How useful was this page or article?

This article is rated ***0.27 out of 5 stars (48 ratings).

Not useful at all Not very useful Useful Very useful Extremely useful
* ** *** **** *****
Team Physicians to the UW Huskies Varsity Athletes...And You!
Copyrights and disclaimer  | Privacy statement | Editorial policy
Problems or questions? Contact the webmaster.
Copyright © 2008 University of Washington - Seattle, WA. All rights reserved.