Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine  
  Home   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Links   |   News  
Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine  
Advanced Search
Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine
HomeSummaryReview of the conditionConsidering surgeryTypes of surgery recommendedWho should consider arthroscopic labral repair/capsulorraphy?What happens without surgery?Surgical optionsEffectiveness Urgency Risks Managing riskPreparing for surgeryAbout the procedureRecovering from surgeryRehabilitationConclusion

Print Print Complete Article
View article with questions Hide Questions



Click here to request a referral online.

Treating Shoulder Dislocation / Subluxation (Instability) and Associated Pain with Minimally Invasive Arthroscopy

Last updated Thursday, May 29, 2008

<< Previous Page Next Page >>

Considering surgery

What kinds of surgery are recommended for cartilage and ligament tears in the shoulder?

Many patients with torn labrum or shoulder cartilage will benefit from arthroscopic repair. The procedures can be done concurrently, if needed; oftentimes the labral cartilage tears away from the bone but is still connected to the ligament. So when the cartilage is repaired, the ligament is tightened, as well.

Patients’ injuries might require an open procedure (using a larger incision than arthroscopy) to adequately stabilize the shoulder. Such injuries would include large, bony fractures of the glenoid socket (“bony Bankart lesions”), for instance.

Who should consider arthroscopic labral repair/capsulorraphy for cartilage and ligament tears in the shoulder and in what cases?

Arthroscopic repair is appropriate and usually effective for a patient whose pain and/or instability suggests a torn cartilage and/or capsular ligament.

However, in cases of more substantive injury to the humerus or glenoid, or to surrounding bones, muscles or tendons, the surgeon might be more likely to recommend an open approach to the procedure.

What happens if nothing is done for cartilage and ligament tears in the shoulder (best case/worst case scenarios)?

Without surgery, in the best-case scenario, the patient would adapt to the condition and any corresponding loss of motion, or satisfactorily change their lifestyle and activities. Pain and/or instability would plateau at a degree that the patient finds bearable, and the injury would not worsen.

In the worst-case scenario, the tear or tears worsen, causing more pain, or the ligament stretches more, making the shoulder less stable. Either of these conditions can damage the articular cartilage – the smooth, almost frictionless cartilage on the surfaces of the bones – and this can lead to arthritis. As well, frequent dislocations of the humerus can, over time, break down the outer edge of the glenoid socket, much as the top edge of a golf tee is worn down or chipped. This accelerates the frequency with which the humerus subluxates or dislocates from the glenoid with decreasing amounts of force, sometimes even occurring in their sleep.

What options exist for surgery for cartilage and ligament tears in the shoulder?

The two main options are arthroscopic repair and open repair. The open technique for years has been the standard approach.The surgeon makes a longer (10 cm) vertical incision to the patient’s shoulder, above the armpit. The bigger incision gives easy visual access to the joint and its surrounding tissues but requires the surgeon to divide tendons to gain instrumental access to the joint.

This more invasive procedure is performed, appropriately, when the humerus or glenoid bones are severely damaged, or when large, bony fractures of the glenoid socket (“bony Bankart lesions”) exist. The open approach requires an overnight stay at the hospital after surgery. Postoperative pain can be greater for patients undergoing an open procedure.

With arthroscopic repair, a series of three or four small (1 cm) incisions around the shoulder gives a surgeon minimally invasive access to the injured tissues. Fewer surgeons have significant experience with this technique, as it is more technically demanding. Data suggests that, for many shoulder procedures, an arthroscopic approach yields similarly positive patient outcomes as the open approach.

The bonuses of arthroscopic technique, if it is appropriate to the patient’s injury, are less postoperative pain and scarring. Additionally since no tendons are divided, the risk of late tendon weakness or failure is avoided.

When performed by an experienced surgeon, how effective is arthroscopic labral repair/capsulorraphy for cartilage and ligament tears in the shoulder likely to be and how long will the benefit last?

The effectiveness of the arthroscopic procedure depends on the health and motivation of the patient, the condition of the shoulder, and the expertise of the surgeon. When performed by an experienced surgeon, arthroscopic labral repair and/or capsulorraphy usually provides improved shoulder comfort and function, and the patient ultimately can return to sports activities, if he or she desires.

The arthroscopic procedure’s success rate is above 90 percent. An experienced surgeon performing this repair can provide a patient with decades of reduced or no pain, and/or with much improved shoulder stability.

The open repair has had a longstanding, well-documented rate of success also above 90 percent. For traumatic anterior shoulder instability, the most dependable results have been achieved with an open repair. One trade-off is that the open repair is more likely to create residual minor stiffness.

The return to athletic activities after open surgery is at least as fast as with arthroscopic repair, but most patients return to work faster after the arthroscopic approach.

How urgent is arthroscopic labral repair/capsulorraphy for cartilage and ligament tears in the shoulder?

Surgery for cartilage tears or instability is not an emergency. Labral repair or capsulorraphy are an elective outpatient procedure that can be scheduled when circumstances are optimal. The patient has time to become informed and to select an experienced surgeon.

It is advisable to consider surgical repair even after a first-time dislocation. Recurrent instability occurs variably but is more frequent in young, aggressive athletes; that population has a rate of recurrence above 80 percent. Older, more sedentary people have lower rates of repeat dislocation. While the traditional wisdom has been to wait-and-see whether instability becomes a recurrent problem, each patient should make the decision about surgery based on available information. For example, a traditional weekend athlete who plays pickup ball might decide to wait-and-see, but the kayaker, skydiver or rock-climber might be at considerably more risk with a sudden re-dislocation in a precarious situation.

Before surgery is undertaken, the patient needs to be in optimal health, understand and accept the risks and alternatives of surgery, and understand the postoperative rehabilitation program.

Surgery should be performed when conditions are optimal. In some cases, particularly with non-traumatic instability, an extended effort at non-operative management is suggested. Usually a six- to twelve-week attempt at strengthening exercises is sufficient to determine whether exercises are likely to be effective. However, in many cases, therapy will strengthen the surrounding muscles and improve function, though it will not heal the torn tissues.

What are the most frequent and most serious risks of arthroscopic labral repair/capsulorraphy for cartilage and ligament tears in the shoulder? How common are they?

The complications of arthroscopic shoulder surgery for cartilage and ligament tears are infrequent. Risks include but are not limited to the following: infection, injury to cartilage, nerves and blood vessels, fracture, stiffness or recurrent instability of the joint, pain, blood clots and the need for additional surgeries. There are also risks in having anesthesia and the administration of a variety of medications. Blood clots in the legs (deep venous thrombosis, or DVT) can form and travel to the lungs and make breathing difficult. This is also very rare unless the patient has a predilection to clotting.

An experienced shoulder surgical team will use special techniques to minimize these risks, but cannot totally eliminate them.

If risks occur during or after arthroscopic labral repair/capsulorraphy for cartilage and ligament tears in the shoulder how are they managed?

Many risks of shoulder arthroscopic surgery for cartilage and ligament tears can be effectively managed if they are promptly identified and treated. Infections, while rarely seen, may be treated with antibiotics or require a cleansing in the operating room.

Injuries to nerves or blood vessels are exceedingly rare, but may require repair. DVTs are usually treated with medications.

Surgery for Cartilage and ligament tears in the shoulder at the University of Washington

If you are interested in making an appointment to discuss this procedure, you can request an appointment using our online referrals website. To request a referral online, please click here. You can also call 206-598-4288 (outside the Seattle area: 800-440-3280) to make an appointment.


<< Previous Page Next Page >>


How useful was this page or article?

This article is rated **** out of 5 stars (11 ratings).

Not useful at all Not very useful Useful Very useful Extremely useful
* ** *** **** *****
Team Physicians to the UW Huskies Varsity Athletes...And You!
Copyrights and disclaimer  | Privacy statement | Editorial policy
Problems or questions? Contact the webmaster.
Copyright © 2008 University of Washington - Seattle, WA. All rights reserved.