Outcome Measurement.

Last updated Tuesday, January 25, 2005

Bibliography

Selected references

1. Bayley, K. B.; London, M. R.; Grunkemeier, G. L.; and Lansky, D. J.: Measuring the success of treatment in patient terms. Med. Care, 33(4 Suppl):AS226-35, 1995.
2. Bombardier, C.; Melfi, C. A.; Paul, J.; Green, R.; Hawker, G.; Wright, J.; and Coyte, P.: Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Med. Care, 33(4 Suppl):AS131-44, 1995.
3. Cleary, P. D.; Reilly, D. T.; Greenfield, S.; Mulley, A. G.; Wexler, L.; Frankel, F.; and McNeil, B. J.: Using patient reports to assess health-related quality of life after total hip replacement. Qual. Life Res., 2:3-11, 1993
4. Fitzpatrick R.; Ziebland S.; Jenkinson C.; Mowat A.; and Mowat A.: The social dimension of health status measures in rheumatoid arthritis. International Disabilities Studies, 13(2):34-37, April-June 1991.
5. Johanson, N. A.; Charlson, M. E.; Szatrowski, T.gif.; and Ranawat, C.S.: A self administered hip-rating questionnaire for the assessment of outcome after total hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg., 74-A:587-97, 1992.
6. Lippitt, S. B.; Harryman, D. T., II; and Matsen, F. A., III: A Practical Tool for Evaluating Function: The Simple Shoulder Test. In The Shoulder: A Balance of Mobility and Stability, pp. 501-518. Edited by F.A. Matsen, III, F.H. Fu, and R.J. Hawkins. Rosemont, Il, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1993.
7. Lyons R.A.; Lo S.V.; and Littlepage B.N.C.: Comparative health status of patients with 11 common illnesses in Wales. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 48(4):388-390, August 1994.
8. Kantz, M. E.; Harris, W. J.; Levitsky, K.; Ware, J. E.; and Davies, A. R.: Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement. Medical Care, 30(5 Suppl):MS240-52, 1990.
9. Katz, J. N.; Harris, T. M.; Larson, M.G.; Krushell, R. J.; Brown, C. H.; Fossel, A. H.; and Liang, M. H.: Predictors of functional outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. J. Rheumatol., 19(12):1938-42, 1992.
10. Matsen, F. A., III; Lippitt, S. B.; Sidles, J. A.; and Harryman, D.T., II: Practical Evaluation and Management of the Shoulder. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1994.
11. Matsen, F. A., III: Early effectiveness of shoulder arthroplasty for patients with primary glenohumeral joint disease. J. Bone Joint Surg., In press, 1995.
12. Matsen, F. A., III; Ziegler, D. W.; and DeBartolo, S.E.: Patient self-assessment of health status in glenohumeral degenerative joint disease. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., In press, 1995.
13. Nerenz D.R.; Repasky D.gif.; Whitehouse F.W.; and Kahkonen D.M.: Ongoing assessment of health status in patients with diabetes mellitus. Medical Care, 30(5):MS112-124, May 1992.
14. Radosevich, D. M.; Wetzler, H.; and Wilson, S. M.: Health status questionnaire (HSQ) 2.0: Scoring comparisons and reference data. Health Outcomes Institute, Bloomington, MN, 1994.
15. Ware J.E. Jr.; and Sherbourne C.D.: The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6): 473-81, June 1992.
16. Ware, J. E.; Snow, K. K.; Kosinski, M.; and Gandek, B.: In SFÊ36 Health Survey, Manual and Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, 1993.

Disclaimer

This resource has been provided by the University of Washington Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine as general information only. This information may not apply to a specific patient. Additional information may be found at http://www.orthop.washington.edu or by contacting the UW Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine.

How useful was this page or article? This article is rated out of 5 stars (1 ratings). Not useful at all Not very useful Useful Very useful Extremely useful